By Marcie Barnes
This hour plus long talk at UNC's Kenan-Flagler Business School with Wal-Mart's Senior Vice President of Sustainability Matt Kistler and adjunct professor Kellie McElhaney from the Kenan-Flagler Business School at UNC was actually, refreshing. I had my serious skepticism hat on going in, and came out impressed. Below are my notes. This was written in shorthand and highly paraphrased. I have enclosed in quotes a few things that were said verbatim:
A few highlights about Wal-Mart from Dean Jim Dean were:
There are 200 million customers per week worldwide, over 100,000 suppliers, and 2.1 million associates (employees). Their main goals in reference to sustainability are to have zero waste, use 100% renewable energy, and sell products that sustain our resources and the environment.
Matt started his presentation - the highlights of that are here:
- Only 8% of their total footprint is in their control currently, which is why they developed the sustainability index.
- In the past couple years (since he has been in this role) they have achieved 30% more energy efficiency in stores, 25% more efficiency in fleet.
- They are testing alternative fuels/technologies for trucks: hybrids, liquid natural gas, and retrofitted engines that can run on waste grease from stores.
- Less than 1.7% of their supplier base is considered "red" - which would mean issues with their social or environmental goals, if they don't improve within a given time frame, they will be "fired".
- They audit 14,000 suppliers on site each year.
- The sustainability index will include a 'scoring algorithm' developed in conjunction with "well-known software company".
- Reuters article recently posted: Walmart Sustainability Index Means Big Business
Questions directly from Ms. McElhaney are here (answers very paraphrased):
Q: Why is Wal-Mart doing this?
A: We were receiving and combating a lot of negative press and were working to tell people we're not bad, instead of being proactive and showing "what we can do". "This is not an abstract part of our company." "Green products should not cost more, they should cost less."
Q: What has been your biggest disappointment?
A: Technology and innovation not going fast enough to solve problems.
Q: Are consumers or corporations helping most with the problems?
A: "We're known for being a little cheap" - both have to work together.
Q: Is Wal-Mart leading the U.S. Government?
A: (He admittedly ducked this question, but said he is getting great support from Washington).
Before turning to the audience for questions, said that Wal-Mart sent her a script to follow and she "lost" it. One last question from her:
Q: What's your scariest scenario?
A: Uncertainty about new technologies, making the right choices. Do we choose solar panel A or solar panel B?
Below are the questions from the audience (questions and answers paraphrased):
Q: Is there a goal to phase out less sustainable products?
A: Yes as long as the products are at a price point the consumer wants.
Q: Will Wal-Mart customers really care about the sustainability index?
A: Wal-Mart won't stand the test of time if it is not relevant to the customer. Younger customers want sustainable products. "We are improving quality." See video - The Secret Life of Sour Cream.
Q: (About suppliers' role in this process)
A: Wal-Mart trained suppliers in China on how to be most energy-efficient. "We're not making suppliers more energy efficient, we're buying more from those who are. It's the carrot vs. the stick."
Q: Why not use existing ways to measure sustainability instead of making up your own?
A: Wal-Mart does use best industry standards, funds college and university work and research, etc. in addition to its own index.
Q: Talk about efforts to source local produce
A: Wal-Mart is doing more of this than ever before. For example, they now buy peaches from 18 states instead of just one. His mother was just talking about how bad tomatoes taste, and it's because they are produced to be able to withstand the distribution system and lose their flavor. "Go back to the way it was." "The consumer is boss." The challenge of this is indeed quality standards. They have a goal to be sourcing from one million local farmers in China alone by 2012.
Back to Ms. McElhaney for a few more questions:
Q: Will you ever do enough?
A: Probably not, not in my lifetime.
Q: What's next for Wal-Mart?
A: A lot of work with greenhouse gases and climate issues. How to develop areas locally to grow and produce products.
Q: What about your personal impact? How has this impacted you?
A: Looks at friends heating systems and recycling habits, notices the light bulbs in his hotel room are not compact fluorescent, etc. He looks at things differently now.
Friday, September 25, 2009
Wal-Mart's VP of Sustainability talks at UNC
Posted by
Marcie Barnes
at
10:45 PM
0
comments
Friday, August 7, 2009
Think organic & eco-friendly are always more expensive? You're wrong!
Posted by
Marcie Barnes
at
2:13 PM
11
comments
Labels: Health, Health: Environmental, Health: Nutrition and Diet
Wednesday, July 22, 2009
Mass Pollution & Illegal Pig Slaughtering Compliments of Smithfield Foods
**See update/edit after 4th paragraph regarding pig slaughter method.**
This 2006 article from Rolling Stone sums up all of Smithfield Foods' dirty little secrets quite well. The subtitle tells us that "America's top pork producer churns out a sea of waste that has destroyed rivers, killed millions of fish and generated one of the largest fines in EPA history. Welcome to the dark side of the other white meat."
And as I suspected, the Chairman of Smithfield Foods, according to the article, is reaping the benefits in his "multimillion-dollar condo on Park Avenue in Manhattan and conveys himself about the planet in a corporate jet and a private yacht." (The article also notes that "the 500,000 pigs at a single Smithfield subsidiary in Utah generate more fecal matter each year than the 1.5 million inhabitants of Manhattan.")
If that's not disturbing enough, I realized after watching the documentary film Food, Inc. (please follow that link and search for showtimes near you) that they are slaughtering their pigs in an illegal manner -- at least at the Tar Heel, NC slaughterhouse where a worker filmed undercover footage for the documentary. (The Tar Heel facility is the largest slaughterhouse in the world, by the way). What appeared to be groups of a dozen or so pigs crushed to death by machine (which was the same observation made in this movie review) is a far cry from the terms of the Humane Slaughter Act of 1958.
From the Wikipedia entry: "According to the law, animals should be stunned into unconsciousness prior to their slaughter to ensure a quick, relatively painless death." The pigs in the footage I saw were clearly, awake, walking, and "terrified" according to movie reviewer Brian Clark Howard.
Just last year, an undercover People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) investigator filmed a Sampson County employee mistreating pigs at another slaughterhouse. Consequently, the worker was charged with 6 counts of animal cruelty. What, I wonder, is the penalty for crushing approximately 35,000 pigs to death every day, possibly since 1992?
What you can do: Stop purchasing factory-farmed meat. This is found in fast food, most restaurants, and in most of the packaged meats in grocery stores. Instead, vote with your dollars by supporting local farmers who treat their livestock humanely. I just found this local, grass-fed ground beef at WholeFoods for $4.99/lb - which meant my husband's burger meat cost a whopping $1.75:
From the USDA's guidelines: "The gas must be administered in a way that produces surgical anesthesia quickly and calmly, with a minimum of excitement and discomfort to the animals"
Is that really what is happening? Send messages to:
Smithfield: http://www.smithfieldfoods.com/contact
Their rep, Paula Deen: @Paula_Deen (on twitter)
PETA: http://www.peta.org/about/c-report_cruelty.asp (The Smithfield plant is on Hwy 87W in Tar Heel, NC)
Posted by
Marcie Barnes
at
1:59 PM
7
comments
Labels: Health, Health: Environmental, Health: Kids', Health: Nutrition and Diet, Other Research: Internet
Tuesday, July 14, 2009
HFCS at WholeFoods? Say it Ain't So!
I admit after some searching I find I am not the first person to make this discovery. But how many also had the general impression that there were no HFCS (High-fructose corn syrup) products at Whole Foods?
I knew that Earth Fare had a non-HFCS policy. Unfortunately, I assumed Whole Foods did as well. A huge benefit, for me at least, in shopping in these earth and health-friendly stores is the comfort in knowing they choose to sell products good for us, and the planet.
I could not find such a policy on Whole Foods' site, someone please point me there if there is one. I did find this tweet, however, that explains "none of our 365 products contain HFCS and only a small % of our branded products do, unlike in other stores."
Other tweets explain that "HFCS isn't on our unacceptable ingredient list, but you'll still find it's the exception, not the convention in our stores."
Here is what I found:
This is a shrimp tray, with cocktail sauce included. The HFCS (and more corn syrup later) is in the sauce. What baffles me, in part, is why it seems that the cocktail sauce was portioned out from a bottled shelf brand that has HFCS, when there is an organic 365 brand available without HFCS. Furthermore, I think it might be even simpler (and cheaper) for the kitchen to mix some 365 organic ketchup with a little grated horseradish, and voila! Cocktail sauce.
Don't get me wrong, I love Whole Foods (I was actually there a couple days ago because I was in a bad mood and being there cheers me up :)) I just find it odd that they (my local Cary, NC store, by the way) would package up some shrimp with HFCS sauce and showcase it in the seafood section.
I was actually curious about Whole Foods non-top ranking in Greenpeace's recent Seafood Scorecard report. More on that coming up. Stay tuned.
What do you think? Should HFCS be on the unacceptable list at Whole Foods? I think so, especially considering recent news regarding mercury in HFCS.
Posted by
Marcie Barnes
at
5:23 PM
0
comments
Labels: Health, Health: Kids', Health: Nutrition and Diet, Nutrition Research
Thursday, July 2, 2009
Greenpeace's Grocery Store Scorecard Released & End of the Line Widget
By Marcie Barnes
Posted by
Marcie Barnes
at
11:47 AM
0
comments
Monday, June 29, 2009
Michael Jackson's Earth Song
Posted by
Marcie Barnes
at
5:13 PM
0
comments
Labels: Health: Environmental
Tuesday, June 16, 2009
Yes! President Obama's Ocean Policy & Much News on Global Warming
By Marcie Barnes
Posted by
Marcie Barnes
at
2:53 PM
4
comments
Labels: Health: Environmental, Health: Kids'
Wednesday, April 22, 2009
A Reminder on Earth Day: Protect our Seas
By Marcie Barnes
Photo credit goes to: only_point_five on flickr.
There are a lot of scary things going on in the fishing industry that compel me to remind you to pick and choose which seafood you purchase. This page on the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations details the use of things such as poisons, explosives, and “pounding” (oh my!) to name a few.
And then there is overfishing, defined beautifully by the folks at www.overfishing.org:
“Over three quarters of our planet are covered by the oceans. Their biodiversity is unmatched and they contain over 80 percent of all life on earth, mostly unexplored. Millions of people worldwide are depending on the oceans for their daily livelihoods. More and more all this is endangered because of ignorance and a global lack of management.”
For your convenience, I have included a list of what to eat and what to avoid. (This is the Southeast US version, visit http://www.montereybayaquarium.org/cr/cr_seafoodwatch/download.aspx to download a pocket version to carry in your wallet).
Don’t continue to economically support practices that are destructive to our planet (Some are on the list because of mercury content concerns, link to factsheets for more information.)
BEST CHOICES: |
GOOD ALTERNATIVES: |
Shrimp (U.S. Gulf of Mexico, U.S. South Atlantic wild-caught) |
AVOID: |
Posted by
Marcie Barnes
at
4:11 PM
3
comments


