Friday, August 7, 2009
Think organic & eco-friendly are always more expensive? You're wrong!
Posted by
Marcie Barnes
at
2:13 PM
11
comments
Labels: Health, Health: Environmental, Health: Nutrition and Diet
Wednesday, July 22, 2009
Mass Pollution & Illegal Pig Slaughtering Compliments of Smithfield Foods
**See update/edit after 4th paragraph regarding pig slaughter method.**
This 2006 article from Rolling Stone sums up all of Smithfield Foods' dirty little secrets quite well. The subtitle tells us that "America's top pork producer churns out a sea of waste that has destroyed rivers, killed millions of fish and generated one of the largest fines in EPA history. Welcome to the dark side of the other white meat."
And as I suspected, the Chairman of Smithfield Foods, according to the article, is reaping the benefits in his "multimillion-dollar condo on Park Avenue in Manhattan and conveys himself about the planet in a corporate jet and a private yacht." (The article also notes that "the 500,000 pigs at a single Smithfield subsidiary in Utah generate more fecal matter each year than the 1.5 million inhabitants of Manhattan.")
If that's not disturbing enough, I realized after watching the documentary film Food, Inc. (please follow that link and search for showtimes near you) that they are slaughtering their pigs in an illegal manner -- at least at the Tar Heel, NC slaughterhouse where a worker filmed undercover footage for the documentary. (The Tar Heel facility is the largest slaughterhouse in the world, by the way). What appeared to be groups of a dozen or so pigs crushed to death by machine (which was the same observation made in this movie review) is a far cry from the terms of the Humane Slaughter Act of 1958.
From the Wikipedia entry: "According to the law, animals should be stunned into unconsciousness prior to their slaughter to ensure a quick, relatively painless death." The pigs in the footage I saw were clearly, awake, walking, and "terrified" according to movie reviewer Brian Clark Howard.
Just last year, an undercover People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) investigator filmed a Sampson County employee mistreating pigs at another slaughterhouse. Consequently, the worker was charged with 6 counts of animal cruelty. What, I wonder, is the penalty for crushing approximately 35,000 pigs to death every day, possibly since 1992?
What you can do: Stop purchasing factory-farmed meat. This is found in fast food, most restaurants, and in most of the packaged meats in grocery stores. Instead, vote with your dollars by supporting local farmers who treat their livestock humanely. I just found this local, grass-fed ground beef at WholeFoods for $4.99/lb - which meant my husband's burger meat cost a whopping $1.75:
From the USDA's guidelines: "The gas must be administered in a way that produces surgical anesthesia quickly and calmly, with a minimum of excitement and discomfort to the animals"
Is that really what is happening? Send messages to:
Smithfield: http://www.smithfieldfoods.com/contact
Their rep, Paula Deen: @Paula_Deen (on twitter)
PETA: http://www.peta.org/about/c-report_cruelty.asp (The Smithfield plant is on Hwy 87W in Tar Heel, NC)
Posted by
Marcie Barnes
at
1:59 PM
7
comments
Labels: Health, Health: Environmental, Health: Kids', Health: Nutrition and Diet, Other Research: Internet
Tuesday, July 14, 2009
HFCS at WholeFoods? Say it Ain't So!
I admit after some searching I find I am not the first person to make this discovery. But how many also had the general impression that there were no HFCS (High-fructose corn syrup) products at Whole Foods?
I knew that Earth Fare had a non-HFCS policy. Unfortunately, I assumed Whole Foods did as well. A huge benefit, for me at least, in shopping in these earth and health-friendly stores is the comfort in knowing they choose to sell products good for us, and the planet.
I could not find such a policy on Whole Foods' site, someone please point me there if there is one. I did find this tweet, however, that explains "none of our 365 products contain HFCS and only a small % of our branded products do, unlike in other stores."
Other tweets explain that "HFCS isn't on our unacceptable ingredient list, but you'll still find it's the exception, not the convention in our stores."
Here is what I found:

This is a shrimp tray, with cocktail sauce included. The HFCS (and more corn syrup later) is in the sauce. What baffles me, in part, is why it seems that the cocktail sauce was portioned out from a bottled shelf brand that has HFCS, when there is an organic 365 brand available without HFCS. Furthermore, I think it might be even simpler (and cheaper) for the kitchen to mix some 365 organic ketchup with a little grated horseradish, and voila! Cocktail sauce.
Don't get me wrong, I love Whole Foods (I was actually there a couple days ago because I was in a bad mood and being there cheers me up :)) I just find it odd that they (my local Cary, NC store, by the way) would package up some shrimp with HFCS sauce and showcase it in the seafood section.
I was actually curious about Whole Foods non-top ranking in Greenpeace's recent Seafood Scorecard report. More on that coming up. Stay tuned.
What do you think? Should HFCS be on the unacceptable list at Whole Foods? I think so, especially considering recent news regarding mercury in HFCS.
Posted by
Marcie Barnes
at
5:23 PM
0
comments
Labels: Health, Health: Kids', Health: Nutrition and Diet, Nutrition Research
Thursday, July 2, 2009
Greenpeace's Grocery Store Scorecard Released & End of the Line Widget
By Marcie Barnes

Posted by
Marcie Barnes
at
11:47 AM
0
comments
Monday, June 29, 2009
Michael Jackson's Earth Song
Posted by
Marcie Barnes
at
5:13 PM
0
comments
Labels: Health: Environmental
Tuesday, June 16, 2009
Yes! President Obama's Ocean Policy & Much News on Global Warming

Posted by
Marcie Barnes
at
2:53 PM
4
comments
Labels: Health: Environmental, Health: Kids'
Wednesday, April 22, 2009
A Reminder on Earth Day: Protect our Seas
By Marcie Barnes
Photo credit goes to: only_point_five on flickr.
There are a lot of scary things going on in the fishing industry that compel me to remind you to pick and choose which seafood you purchase. This page on the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations details the use of things such as poisons, explosives, and “pounding” (oh my!) to name a few.
And then there is overfishing, defined beautifully by the folks at www.overfishing.org:
“Over three quarters of our planet are covered by the oceans. Their biodiversity is unmatched and they contain over 80 percent of all life on earth, mostly unexplored. Millions of people worldwide are depending on the oceans for their daily livelihoods. More and more all this is endangered because of ignorance and a global lack of management.”
For your convenience, I have included a list of what to eat and what to avoid. (This is the Southeast US version, visit http://www.montereybayaquarium.org/cr/cr_seafoodwatch/download.aspx to download a pocket version to carry in your wallet).
Don’t continue to economically support practices that are destructive to our planet (Some are on the list because of mercury content concerns, link to factsheets for more information.)
BEST CHOICES: |
GOOD ALTERNATIVES: |
Shrimp (U.S. Gulf of Mexico, U.S. South Atlantic wild-caught) |
AVOID: |
Posted by
Marcie Barnes
at
4:11 PM
3
comments
Thursday, April 9, 2009
Cell Phone/Wifi Radiation and Your Health
By Marcie Barnes
Summarized from an assignment I completed for:
JOMC 710 "Computing Concepts and Issues: Power Tools for the Mind"
Professor Deb Aikat, Ph. D
April 9th, 2009
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
THE ISSUE
Most of us are familiar with the possible dangers of radiation from things such as nuclear power plants, microwave ovens, x-rays, and power lines. New technology has introduced a few more devices that have entered the debate over what levels of radiation are harmful: the cell phone, and more recently, the wireless network. Because cell phones are used by 83% of Americans, and by some for the majority of their day, exposure to cell phones and the radiation they omit should be a top-of-mind issue. Similarly, wireless networks, commonly known as wifi, are popping up all over the country and the world, including public schools, in order to connect laptop and web-enabled phone users to the Internet. Both of these technologies may be causing a greater health risk via the radiation they emit.
FIVE FEARS OF THE ISSUE
1) General decline in public health: There are a bevy of research-proven illnesses attributed to overexposure to radiation, including: asthma, sleep disorders, anxiety disorders, attention deficit disorder, autism, multiple sclerosis, ALS, Alzheimer's disease, epilepsy, fibromyalgia, chronic fatigue syndrome, cataracts, hypothyroidism, diabetes, malignant melanoma, cancer, heart attacks and strokes (including in young people) and "radio wave sickness". The more people are exposed to these devices and the towers associated with them, the higher the chances are that illness may ensue at some point.
2) Forest die-off, reproductive failure and population decline - these things have been found in many species of birds, as well as ill health and birth deformities in farm animals near microwave towers. Possible implications could include disruption of the food chain that could lead to extinction, contaminated food supply via direct exposure or from the birth defects and degradation of the animal's genetic material.
3) Privacy concerns - Some people are beginning to feel "invaded" by the proliferation of microwave radiation in our cities and towns, and even some of the most rural areas are no longer safe havens for those who may choose to live or spend time away from towers. Lawsuits could become more prevalent if more people fall ill and the link between radiation from wireless devices and illness is proven.
4) Major loss of productivity and well-being - Non-diagnosed, symptomatic effects of radiation sickness including things such as nausea, headache, fatigue, weakness, and depression could vastly effect the productivity and well-being of Americans.
5) Increased risk for children and teens - Those who are using these devices at a faster and faster pace are those perhaps most susceptible -- most likely because of their thinner skulls and developing tissues. This youtube video shows a study done in 1997 that reveals the higher amount of penetration in children: (Paul Fitzgerald: EMF expert and founder of the Research Center for Wireless Technology)
HELPFUL RESOURCES
1) Cell Phone Radiation News Bureau
http://cprnews.com/World-News
2) Electromagnetic Frequencies Blog
http://cellphonesafety.wordpress.com".
3) Wikipedia Entries on Mobile Phone Radiation and Health and Wireless Electronic Devices and Health
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mobile_phone_radiation_and_health
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wireless_electronic_devices_and_health
4) Techdirt.com
http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20061212/080748.shtml
http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20080728/1034471811.shtml
http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20080325/002149639.shtml
http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20071203/003533.shtml
http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20070725/095038.shtml
5) C-Net's Quick Guide: Cell Phone Radiation Levels
http://reviews.cnet.com/cell-phone-radiation-levels
6) The dangers of Wi-Fi radiation
http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/blog/2007/may/21/thedangersof
7) 5 tips to limit your cell phone risk
http://www.cnn.com/2008/HEALTH/07/31/ep.cell.phones.cancer/index.html
POSSIBLE SOLUTIONS
*Air on the side of caution - Use an earpiece instead of holding the device to your head, particularly for longer conversations. Bluetooth devices are a better alternative to holding the phone up to your head, but a wired headset with a ferrite bead or a hollow-tube device are the expert's choice. Keep conversations to a minimum. This simple yet effective piece of advice can save you quite a bit of radiation. Think back to the days when cell calls were .80/minute, and this one's easy to do. Avoid long conversations in locations, such as rural areas or enclosed areas, where a cell phone's network signal is weak. A weak signal makes the phone emit more power so it can connect to a faraway cell tower.
* If you buy your preteen or young teenager a phone, make sure he or she follows the above precautionary measures. Parents should be vigilant about their children's using speakers or hands-free devices, and about limiting the number of calls and amount of time their children spend on the phone. A comprehensive list of strategies (for both young and old) is found here: http://planetgreen.discovery.com/food-health/reduce-your-risks-from-cellpho.html
* File complaints to the Federal Trade Commission, the nation's consumer protection agency, and your local government officials about your concerns about lack of space to go to be "free" of technology radiation.
Posted by
Marcie Barnes
at
1:15 PM
3
comments
Labels: Health, Health: Kids', Health: Mental